After a historic U. Supreme Court decision opened the matrimonial door for California same-sex partners — and prohibits the federal government from discriminating against them — I have just two words of advice for those couples: As a result, it is now legal — and in many cases, advisable — for same-sex couples to tie the knot in California, one of 13 states in which gay marriage is now legal.
Introduction The issues of marriage are very complex, especially when dealing with issues of who should and should not be married, and what being married really means.
In this article I am going to attempt to cover the issue of marriage from a wide perspective and try to makes sense out of it. I think that a lot of confusion and polarization on the issue of gay, lesbian and same sex marriage has come from not looking at the big picture.
In this article on marriage and who should be married, I try to take into account all factors including the evolution of marriage, the history of marriage, legal issues, civil rights, human biology and reproduction, children, religion, love, relationships, heterosexual and homosexual issues, what is normal and where normal matters.
The idea is that when people look at the entire scope of issues surrounding marriage that a different perspective is created.
I contend that no matter what side of the issue you are on with regards to same sex marriage, that the arguments contained herein will give you something to think about. That even if you don't agree with me, it will change your perspective on the subject and cause you to look at your own views in a different light.
My conclusions in this article represent my opinion and are not to be considered to be any kind of strong statement of position. This is an area where there is really no position I can take that I'm entirely comfortable with and I will point out obvious flaws in my own arguments that undermine my position.
I'm sure that there is something here to offend everyone on the planet, so if you're offended, so be it. Biology, Sex, Reproduction, Evolution Three billion years ago life on this planet began to reproduce by sexual reproduction.
Males and Why should same sex couples be married of species mated and combined their DNA to produce new individuals that combined traits from both parents. This way of reproducing produced genetic diversity and created new traits in which the fittest survived to pass on their advantages to future generations.
Genetic superiority is just one of the factors in survival. An individual needed not only to be born, but also to survive to reproductive age and reproduce before dying. Various creatures evolved social strategies to protect themselves and hunt for food and to defend against predators.
These social groupings ranged form hives of bees to solitary individuals who survived on their own except to mate. Humans adopted a number of social strategies in order to survive.
The basic unit of survival historically has been that the parents have been the core providers of their offspring, and that these families have associated with other families into tribes who looked out for each other. Modern governments are the evolutionary extensions of those early tribes.
With the exceptions of new technology, humans still reproduce from the mating of a male and a female. This is where we all come from. Our biological parents are not two men or two women, or three people for that matter. We still recognize that our biological parents are usually the ones who raise the children and are primarily responsible for their upbringing.
Thus there is a basis in reality to distinguish heterosexual families with children as being directly part of the process of reproduction and the continuing the human species. The reproductive process and biological parents and families do create a logical distinction that is not an arbitrary line.
If this line could be compared to the lines that separate states on a map, this line would be like a river in that there is a natural separation.
Having said that, I'm not going to rely on that as my only reason and say that heterosexuality is good and homosexuality is bad.
All I'm doing is saying that there are real distinctions that need to be recognized, and that this distinction needs to be considered in any honest discussion about the reality of marriage.
I contend that this is a significant difference and should not be ignored. The History of Marriage Marriage was born from primitive cultures that recognized that males and females mated and as a result produced children that needed to be cared for. The biological parents were considered to be the primary caregivers, with other relatives and friends taking a secondary role, and the tribe or state being there on a third level.
The families needed each other to survive. Women without males were often at a disadvantage and required more resources from the tribe.
It was in the interest of the tribe to require the fathers to take responsibility for the children they created and force couples to marry based on pregnancy.
When the shotgun was invented, the shotgun wedding soon followed. This was a way to preserve the family unit in cultures where surviving was a chore. Thus marriage was a logical extension of human reproduction and that society organized around the family to survive and for society to survive.
It created a recognition of the idea of couples committing for life and raising children together and sharing the struggles of survival. In general, these social rules had more benefits to society and helped our cultures and species survive.
The definition of marriage has a long tradition of being between one man and one woman and this has been supported across virtually all cultures and has an accepted definition.
This is not a concept that has had a variety of meanings and is not undefined and ambiguous. Again, I don't hold this out as the "final argument" but as a factor to be considered in an overall discussion of the "big picture".
That was then, this is now.Another reason why same sex marriage should be legal is the increase in adoption it already has and will continue to cause.
Millions of children need safe, permanent homes and agencies are more inclined to release children to . Jan 14, · Ok this is how I see it. Traditional marriage was created by God and God dissapproves of same sex couples.
So if a partners are wanting to get married by a judge or the state then they should be able to, legally, bc of separation of church and monstermanfilm.com: Resolved.
Emotional: Many same-sex couples feel a desire to have society recognize their lifetime commitment to each other -- just as many opposite-sex couples do.
Security: Many have a desire to enjoy the security, protections, and cost savings which would flow from marriage, and the or so state benefits automatically to married couples.
For legally married/domestic partner same-sex couples, just as for traditional married couples, a joint revocable trust can help avoid probate and allow a loved one to efficiently manage assets if the partner is incapacitated by illness or injury.
What the argument has to say, if it is to identify a source of fulfillment available to all married men and women but not to same-sex couples, is that the fulfillment inheres in the mere fact that.
For more, visit TIME Health. Same-sex marriage is now legal across the United States, but research on the reasons gays and lesbians get married is sparse. Now, in a recent study published in the.