Download PDF Elections are the centrepiece of the democratic process in countries across the world. With direct democracy being practically inefficient in governing large groups of people, particularly on a state-wide level, elections are needed to choose representatives who will legislate and govern on behalf of the people. This essay will compare the two most prominent competing types of electoral system: With their very nature, proportionally representative electoral systems are more democratic than first-past-the-post systems.
The evidence for proportional representation is clear, consistent and compelling. Countries using it enjoy better economic, social and environmental results. We want consistent policy that makes our province an attractive place to invest, with secure long-term jobs. Pro rep avoids policy swings that put major investments at risk.
More than 80 countries, including nine of the 10 highest-performing economies in the developed world, use pro rep. We want a government that takes child care for our kids and health care for our aging parents seriously.
Studies show pro rep countries tend to better meet the needs of average voters. We want a government that takes a realistic, thoughtful approach to tough challenges, rather than leaving the problems for our children and grandchildren to deal with. Countries with pro rep more effectively tackle big, long-term issues like climate change, which need more than a four-year planning cycle.
We want MLAs who listen to us and who listen to each other. Voters hold a diversity of opinions that cannot be adequately expressed by a single MLA who invariably votes the party line.
By accurately reflecting the way we vote, proportional systems bring multiple perspectives to the decision-making process and force parties to co-operate. We want local MLAs who are elected by voters, not appointed by parties. All three proposed systems provide this.
Under proportional systems, government works in the best interests of a majority of citizens, rather than catering to a privileged elite.
Our opponents have benefited from the current system and their continued political dominance depends on it.
|Should the U.S. adopt proportional representation? | monstermanfilm.com||Proportional representation Save Proportional representation PR characterizes electoral systems in which divisions in an electorate are reflected proportionately in the elected body.|
|A proportional Lords||Proportional representation requires that the distribution of seats broadly be proportional to the distribution of the popular vote among competing political parties.|
|Proportional Representation Samples of Essay, Topics & Paper Examples on StudentShare||Messenger When the UK was given the opportunity to adopt a proportional representation electoral system in theit was notable only for the lack of enthusiasm from voters.|
So, instead of providing facts, they have chosen to rely almost exclusively on fear-mongering, running outrageous ads featuring violence in the streets and goose-stepping soldiers.
Since truth-in-advertising laws do not apply to political campaigns, they are getting away with lying to us. We urge voters to get accurate information from sites like Elections BC and prorepfactcheck.
This referendum is an opportunity to reject politics-as-usual and upgrade our democracy. We have a lot to gain and very little to lose because there will be a confirmatory referendum after two terms. New Zealand switched in the s.
Its confirmatory referendum had more people voting to keep the new system than had voted for it in the first place. The evidence favouring proportional representation is abundant. When we put aside the pie charts and focus on what matters in real life, it is clear that proportional representation does a far better job of giving voters what we voted for.
Join me in embracing a better way to do politics in B. Mail in your ballot.The introduction of proportional representation into the Legislative Council will mean that some sitting MPs will lose their seats. A proportional representation system would be used, with one third of the chamber being elected at a time.
Introduce proportional representation (PR) for parliamentary and local elections (the type of PR is not mentioned) Reduce the voting age to 16 Replace the House of Lords with an elected second chamber. Proportional representation (PR), on the other hand, is the simple principle that parliaments should reflect how people vote are are designed so each voter can help elect .
Watch video · B.C. will vote by mail-in ballot from Oct. 22 to Nov. 30 on whether to adopt a form of proportional representation (PR), or to keep the current first-past-the-post (FPTP) system of voting.
Governments that better represent British Columbians will be better for our environment, so Wildsight strongly supports proportional representation for BC—we hope our supporters will join us in voting yes in this referendum. Break the two-party monopoly. The US needs proportional representation. When there are two major parties and then a bunch of minor ones, all a minor party is ever going to do is act as a "spoiler" and cause the major party that is most similar to it to lose.